The first is to determine the best ontological basis from which to consider the passage of time. According to the b theory, time is very much like the dimensions of space. By contrast, a pure atheory involves a dynamic ontology exhibiting mindindependent temporal becoming, with tense an objective feature of reality and the present as ontologically privileged. Special relativity could be considered an eternalism that does not admit a btheory of time. Eternalism is the statement that things from the past like socrates and dinosaurs exist right now, as do things from the future. Ive always been puzzled by why so many people have such strong intuitions about whether the atheory or the btheory 1 of time is true. I then raise some concerns with the causal theory of time. But simultaneity is not the same across different locations, so there is no bseries.
And, as a matter of fact, an eternalist version of the atheory does face a serious charge of incoherence or instability, as shall appear. It says that all moments of timepast, present, and futurephysically exist in a block universe, which is all of space that exists and all of time that exists. Just as there are no genuine spatial properties like being north, but, rather, only twoplace, spatial relations like north of, so too, according to the b theorist, there are no genuine a properties. A new kind of atheory 19 every true proposition is entailed by truths about which spacetime points and regions there are. Notice that assumptions 1 and 2 only allow one to say that two events are equally determinate. The btheory of time is the name given to one of two positions regarding philosophy of time. Theres not yet a way to say that any event actually is determinate. But, all other moments, past and future, also either were or will be the present time at some point or other, so how can this contradiction be reconciled. Its true that b theory fits better with eternalism than with other metaphysical theories of time, but strictly speaking they are distinct. I develop an argument from qualitative change in favor of tensism and defend eternalism from an argument from fatalism.
The eternalist view that it is always the case that everything exists eternally an events position in time does not determine whether that event exists 2. Eternalism is a philosophical approach to the ontological nature of time, which takes the view that all points in time are equally real, as opposed to the presentist idea that only the present is real. It is completely derived from physics, mostly special relativity. I argue that eternalist atheorists must admit to being able to understand the kinds of tenseless sentences that appear in a btheorists truth. According to eternalism, past and future objects and times are just as real as currently existing ones. On the one hand, it rejects the ontological theses of both eternalism and presentism. Bradford skow 1 the moving spotlight according to the moving spotlight theory of time, the property of being present moves from earlier times to later times, like a spotlight shone on spacetime by god. The opposite view is sometimes called presentism, there are. Two philosophical theories about time presentism is a theory in philosophy which says that the only events and objects which exist are those that exist in the present.
Eternalist tensism is the thesis that tense is an objective feature of reality as it is in itself and that all times, whether past, present, or future, are equally real. Spotlight theory eternalism consists of three theses. Is the btheory of time compatible with libertarian free will. Eternalism, the view that what we regard locally as b eing located in the past, the present and the future equally exists, is the best ontological account of temporal exis tence in line with. So, only things which exist now, right now, really exist. Second, i show that the only way to salvage the btheory is via the adopting of the causal theory of time, and allying this to oaklanders claim that tense is to be eliminated. Request pdf string theory, loop quantum gravity and eternalism eternalism, the view that what we regard locally as being located in the past, the present and the future equally exists, is the. Some forms of eternalism give time a similar ontology to that of space, as a dimension, with different times being as real. On eternalism, and hence the btheory, it seems that one is committed to two conflicting. I recently engaged in a debate with a physicist who objected to the kalam cosmological argument based on his metaphysical assumption of the btheory of time he referred to this theory as eternalism. This would mean that time is just another dimension, that future events are already there, and that there is no objective flow of time. But it is also the case that if eternalism is false, then so is the btheory, since all the alternatives to eternalism single out an objective present. According to the a theory, on the other hand, time is very different from the dimensions of space.
He traces the evolution of the btheory from the old. Philosophers identify two broad and competing views on the nature of time. The atheory, the btheory, and temporal counterpart theory cian dorr st andrews, 1522012 1 1. Btheory also known as a tenseless or static theory says says there isnt a difference between past, present, and future, and that they are all equally real this is referred to as eternalism. The tenseless theory of time and the moodless theory of. Eternalism, the view that what we regard locally as being located in the past, the present and the future equally exists, is the best ontological account of temporal existence in line with special and general relativity. The atheory of time, the btheory of time, and taking. The atheory of time, the btheory of time, and taking tense. A pure btheory, then, involves a tenseless ontology devoid of temporal becoming. Eternalism is often characterized as i noted at the beginningas the view that past, present and future times and objects are equally real. Btheory is to say that it rejects the dynamical thesis. A and b theories of time, and the kalam cosmological. According to presentism, events and entities that are wholly past or wholly future do not exist at all. Mctaggarts argument that time is unreal was agreed by few philosophers, but it opened up a great split among twentieth.
Eternalism, is the philosophical name given to the 4d block universe, aka the tenseless theory of time or the btheory of time. Francesco orilia, on the existential side of the eternalismpresentism dispute, manuscrito, 39, 4, 225, 2016. It builds on the standard method of modeling time as a dimension in physics, to give time a similar ontology to that of space. According to a btheory of time, temporal objects exist tenselessly.
The btheory of time is a name given to one of two positions in the philosophy of time. However, special and general relativity are not fundamental theories and several research programs aim at finding a more fundamental theory of quantum gravity weaving together. The term eternalism seems to me to be a misnomer for any theory of time. The tenseless theory of time includes the ontological thesis of eternalism. Btheorists believe that time is tenseless, rather than tensed, and therefore temporal becoming is not an objective feature of reality. The atheory holds that there is an objective present, while the btheory holds that the present is only subjective. Theory in the twentieth century a companion to the.
The goal is to explain and defend a btheory of time, which i then presuppose for the remainder of the book. My conclusion is that, if one adopts eternalism, the. Eternalism philosophy of time project gutenberg self. What is the difference between eternalism and the b theory. To develop right view or perfect view, we must first be aware of two views which are considered imperfect or wrong the first view is eternalism. Finally, growingblockism is, intuitively, a view that falls somewhere between pre sentism and eternalism. The second is to decipher the relationship between the ontology of time and the passage of time. Theories such as fourdimensionalism and eternalism draw upon the btheory. Philosophical presentism is the view that neither the future nor the past exist. String theory, loop quantum gravity and eternalism. The btheory, on the other hand, presents the semantic view that tensed language is semantically reducible to a tenseless metalanguage earlierlater than relations1. Working within the framework provided by the atheory and the btheory, i have, generally speaking, two aims. Although the distinction between the atheory and the btheory resulted from mctaggarts early twentieth century work on time, the ontology of.
The propertychange dynamic theory of temporal passage. Presentism and eternalism in perspective philsciarchive. What is the difference between eternalism and the b theory of time. More detail on these different positions, and my reasons for believing these assertions can be found in the previous posts, but briefly. This doctrine or belief is concerned with eternal life or with eternal things. The view that past and future events are real is called eternalism. Going back to the alleged commitment of the endurantist to presentism, and hence of the btheorist to perdurantism, we. Whichever theory one endorses, it will shape how one views the world. First, b theory is a semantic theory about the proper way to refer to events in time, not a metaphysical theory about past and future events. I have written about some of the problems with the logical conclusions that follow from this metaphysical assumption here and here.
Eternalism, a theory of infinite justice internet archive. Presentism, eternalism, and the growing universe theory. Endurantism requires presentism, and eternalism requires perdurantism. Nevertheless, eternalism is a btheory, and presentism is an atheory, albeit a truncated one that singles out only the present as real. Mctaggarts detailed analysis subsequently led to a number of productive areas in the modern philosophy of time, including the tensed and tenseless theories of the passage of time. Eternalism is a philosophical approach to the ontological nature of time.
Btheorists argue that the flow of time is an illusion, that the past, present and future are equally real, and that time is tenseless. So, for example, something that has occurred in the past is still real, and hasnt simply just gone out of existence. Pdf string theory, loop quantum gravity and eternalism. Eternalism philosophy of time wikipedia republished. Ive always treated eternalism and the b theory of time as largely synonymous and thought they just refer to the perspective of viewing the universe as a single static entity with slices or instants. Finally, growingblockism is, intuitively, a view that falls somewhere between presentism and eternalism. The use just noted of the english present tense to express neutrality about whether the event described is past, present or future can be harnessed by the btheorist to describe his tenseless facts, so the. Isaac newton was born in 1642 and so, in the manner of speaking usually employed in discussing the presentism eternalism issue, came into existence then. In theology and the philosophy of religion, how one sees the nature of time will also influence how he or she sees god.
The atheory, the b theory, and temporal counterpart theory. Its also more popular than its presentist alternative among philosophers. Ive written atheory and btheory as code for presentism and eternalism, but see the first footnote. Eternalism is a philosophical approach to the ontological nature of time, which takes the view that all existence in time is equally real, as opposed to presentism or the growing block universe theory of time, in which at least the future is not the same as any other time. B theorists hold that the special theory of relativity implies that the universe is a. So if eternalism is true, then the btheory is true. According to the tenseless theory of time, also known as the btheory of time, or the block universe theory of time, tensed language may in some sense which i will. How special relativity thwarts eternalism and more. These assumptions seem to be independent of the theory of special relativity sr. This would mean that temporal becoming is not an objective feature of reality. Eternalism is the philosophy of time that seems to be required by special relativity. Eternalism and nihilism the buddha rejected both extremes of eternalism and nihilism.
1408 1101 1109 188 732 567 1568 1022 797 1652 772 1127 377 908 823 1596 69 410 351 1444 1198 929 160 1096 1333 875 1384 1424 858 1289 646